THE UMMO PAPERS

(all sketches are missing from this webpage)

PART ONE

IBOZOO UU

THE CONCEPT OF SPACE

When you look at yourself in the mirror, the image you see IS NOT IDENTICAL to what other people see when they look at you. Simply hold up a written page in front of a mirror to verify what you have known all the time but not given much thought to. The mirror seems to transpose left to right.

Not long ago, one of our brothers in the United States informed us that a North American writer had written a scientific book which posed the following: if a person sees their image inverted left to right in a mirror, then why isn't the image also reversed top to bottom, with the feet at the top of the image?

It seems that in the United States, only 2 % of the adults they asked could give a satisfactory answer. Only 38 % of a group made up exclusively of experts and students in Physics, Psychiatry and Mathematics could answer quickly.

This illustrates perfectly that if a great percentage of people of the Earth are not prepared to understand certain fundamental concepts in connection with space symmetry, vision and perception on the level of the brain, they will be even less able to understand and analyse proofs and demonstrations in connection with Higher Mathematics.

When two objects are symmetrical in relation to a plane, we say them that they are INNUO VIAAXOO (eniantiomorphic). It is easy to see that these two objects cannot be superimposed, although their morphological identity is obvious: you could yourself, on Earth, find thousands of examples (right shoe and left shoe, left-turning screw and right-turning screw, two ears, etc). Obviously, many INNUO VIAAXOO (enantiomorphic) bodies can be superimposed when their morphology is symmetrical.

Any body which can be divided into two identical parts [ or INNUO VIAAXOO (enantiomorphic) ] in relation to a plane, we say that it is AA INNUO (symmetrical). Some examples of AA INNUO (symmetrical) bodies are the OEMII (human bodies except secondary physiological differences) and the polyhedrons regular among many others.

Any physics student could give the definition of a field according to Earth physics. Is a force field symmetrical? You consider the field to be isotropic. This is false

Imagine that in an " area " of the Cosmos free of asteroids, cosmic dust, gas etc we put a metal sphere. Apparently nothing has changed in the vicinity, so now we put at a distance a smaller sphere, which is attracted towards the larger one with a force you call gravity.

Let us repeat the experiment at various points A, B, C, etc. of this area of the cosmos. The closer we put the small sphere, the larger the force of attraction will be, and so too its speed towards the central mass.

You define the field of forces as an area surrounding the sphere where the phenomenon appears. An area whose ray is infinite. Your physicists are accustomed to graphically representing a field by points to which one assigns a symbol they name vectors (in this case force-vectors. You assign to the central sphere represented by the point M the characteristic of INERT MASS which creates this mysterious GRAVITY FIELD. It is inevitable that serious questions arise regarding such a poorly-explained concept.

What is mass ? Does any particle, any body have an inert mass ? Which is the true nature of these mysterious forces? When we look at an object, we know that it has volume and at the same time that it " weighs ", " has a mass ". Are MASS and VOLUME (or SPACE) the same thing, or at least are these two concepts so closely related that one cannot conceive of an object that has volume but not mass or vice-versa?. A great confusion inevitably arises when we start from the false assumption that space is an entity unto itself, completely separate from our mental phenomena like FEELING and PERCEPTION.

Does space exist OUTSIDE OF OUR MENTAL perception or is it an illusion of our senses?
To answer definitely one way or the other would be a serious error. WE on UMMO know for certain that there is a REALITY outside of ourselves, which stimulates our brain and sets in motion a mental process we call BUAWAIGAAI (perception).

But this reality is as different from MENTAL PERCEPTION as a mountain is from the word "M-O-U-N-T-A-I-N ", which is used to represent it.

This concept is not foreign to your scientists. Some examples: what does COLOUR (PERCEPTION) have in common with the electromagnetic wave which stimulates our retina? The colour is a pure psychological phenomenon. It does not exist outside of the self, and there is even the paradox that different wavelengths cause different perceptions. Thus when the stimulus is 398 Earth (millimicrons), we interpret it as a red patch of colour, but if it arrives at our skin with a slightly longer wavelength, " we feel heat "; something very different than COLOUR: The same external reality causes different illusions.

So also SPACE (as such) is another illusion of our senses. Yes, there is an external " something " which causes this psychological perception but this " something " is really as different from our illusory concept of space as a wavelength is from the green or yellow the spirit perceives.

And we also say to you: your specialists have held onto this idea of differentiating the concepts FIELD of FORCES and SPACE as distinct entities. You admit that the nervous system masks the feeling of FORCES and the feeling of SPACES and work out a system of mathematical equations to define this " something " external to the self called GRAVITATIONAL, MAGNETIC and ELECTROSTATIC FIELD, and this other " three-dimensional or N dimensional something" called SPACE.

You know that a FIELD of FORCES cannot exist outside of a SPACE affected by these fields.

Moreover we affirm that FIELD OF FORCES and SPACE can be identified. There cannot be a universe outside our own in which, because there are no particles, there are no deformations of this space (which we call FIELD) either.

More specifically: the action of the gravitational field is that which stimulates our nerve endings, sending a series of codified impulses to our brain which in turn makes emerge this illusion we call SPACE.

That is why when we speak about dimensions to define space, do not believe that the dimension of length in the WAAM (cosmos) is the same as we imagine it in our minds. As this would require a considerable and continuous mental effort, throughout these reports and for the sake of convenience, the length of a straight line can be considered to be synonymous with dimension, and to a certain degree that is correct.

We will also speak to you about the perception of space, the way in which we conceive the decadimensionnel WAAM, the true concept of asymmetry of our WAAM (Cosmos) which converts it into an ENANTIOMORPHE of the U-WAAM (anticosmos).

We will explain you how we polarise sub-particles to make space travel possible by using the curvature of space and we will also speak to you about true distance which makes such travel possible.

UNIFIED FIELD THEORY. THE IBOZOO UU. TRUE STRUCTURE OF PHYSICAL SPACE, MASS, SUBATOMIC PARTICLES AND GRAVITATION.

During a conversation which you had with my brother on which I depend: DEI 98, son of DEI 97, you asked him for information about travel and the concept of SPACE. The topic is complex as you shall see in the documents that we will give you gradually. Of course, before describing the types of feelings we feel when we travel in a OAWOOLEA UEWA OEMM (lenticular vessel for intra-galactic displacement) it is better that you have a more precise idea of our concept of SPACE.

You will see that our theory differs substantially from that worked out by Earth mathematicians, and that our image of WAAM (our universe, part of the Universes), even though we regard it as a multidimensional UXGIIGIIAM (space) which has in its structure of many curves that we call masses, does not look anything like the Euclidean three-dimensional concept of space, and neither is it a faithful reflection of the modern Earth RIEMAN, BOLYAI or LOBATSCEWSKY models, which assume an N-space (or multidimensional space), implying that the cosmos can adopt the form of a positive- or negative-curvature hypersphere.

There exists for us what is called SPACE - TIME, conceived by MINKOWSKY but plunged in a dimension with N dimensions.

When we expose the concept of the IBOZOO UU (which should never be confused with the concept of point geometry or mathematics, worked out by Earth mathematicians as an abstraction with no basis in physical reality) you will better understand our Theory.

You will notice that the great contrast between your models of space and our, real, model rests in the different interpretation of the concept of dimension ; a concept which for you can be interpreted as a scalar.

An exhaustive elaboration of our Theory of Space would require many hundreds of typed pages. We will thus limit ourselves, in a few pages, to describing the most basic elements of this concept. For those without a strong mathematical background we will use graphs with a simply illustrative value.

That will be useful for you the day the physicists of the Earth finally discover the true nature of the Universe; at that time you can be proud to have had knowledge of these concepts (even if on an elementary level) for several years beforehand.

We are certain that after carefully reading our notes, you will find in them true understanding of the concepts of TIME, of DISTANCE, ATOMIC MASS, PARTICLES, ENERGY and GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS, and of ELECTROSTATICS and MAGNETISM. You will then be able form an idea in your own mind about the panorama that presents itself to space travellers before we describe it in a forthcoming report. Naturally, the travellers' perceptions are not truly extraordinary. They do not have visions of colour never perceived by our retina, or fantastic tactile sensations, or incredible sounds. On the contrary our sensory organs continue to code exterior messages with the same psychological and physiological laws. Only new stimulations, resulting from other sources of energy and matter, are different from those we usually perceive. The Hot planets and Stars are nothing more for us than concentrations of Mass, and to our sensory organs they can effectively disappear.
Do not forget that when changing reference axis, the new three-dimensional space which opens up to us is different. For example certain objects which, under the former reference frame seemed to be concentrations of luminous energy (being reversed), will now be in the form of immense clouds of subatomic particles. A collision with these nebulas would certainly be fatal for the vessel.
Until now in the many reports and conversations, we had spoken about the IBOZOO UU without explaining their meaning, and had limited ourselves to translating this phoneme by " PHYSICAL POINT ". We also resisted the temptation to add a mathematical demonstration closer to our WUUA WAAM (mathematics of physical space ), because that would require an initiation on your part to the to our UWUUA IEES (tetravalent mathematical logic); it is to the detriment of the scientific rigour of the concepts that we expose to you.

Furthermore we advise the people of the Earth not to repeat their harmful practice with this text of trying to read it all at once. Each homogenous paragraph of half a page to two pages must always be assimilated before reading the following one.

THE REAL WAAM AND THE "ILLUSORY" WAAM UNIVERSE).

It is very difficult for the OEMII (man, by extension human, by another extension "intelligent living being) to have a true perception of the real nature of the Physical World which surrounds us. Apparently the mental images we have made for ourselves of this Medium which surrounds us can lead us to conclude in error that the Physical World is as we " see ", " touch " or " feel " it.

But a careful analysis by the scientists of UMMO as well as by Earth scientists, and those of other Galactic civilisations (possessing a certain degree of culture) revealed that our WAAM is not as our senses normally perceive it. So: the vivid colours we enjoy looking at a flower garden are but a beautiful psychological perception. There is no chromatic richness that exists outside of us. Only a range of electromagnetic frequencies remains as the last substratum of perception.

The OEMII is the only being of the WAAM that goes beyond the limits of its own organism to understand the world, and it uses the spirit to this end as an intellectual means, since our bodily senses, nervous system and cortical mechanisms of synthesis and psychological perception completely distort reality.

Let us see for an example how our physiological bodies " distort " the truth by masking things in beautiful clothing, without which our WAAM (universe), viewed as is, would come across as nothing but a cold succession of IBOZOO UU out of phase with each other. (we will explain this concept shortly)

When you take for example a cigarette lighter between your fingers, you are aware that it is THERE: cold, shiny.
" It " is thus THERE, between your index and thumb... it is not a fiction: it EXISTS ". But this lighter is nothing but a simple perception.
The physicists of OYAGAA (the planet squared: the Earth ) could tell you more about this simple pocket lighter. They would say for example that you are not actually touching it, in spite of your sensory perception, since there is of large relative distance between the metal atoms and the electronic clouds of the atoms of the skin covering your fingers.
Perhaps a layman would timidly object if this small piece of metal is not touching his skin, it is impossible to hold it and that it should then " fall to the ground ". But the Earth scientist will speak to him about Force fields, Tensors, Repulsions between negative electric charges.
He will suggest that the metal's low temperature produces this cold sensation and that it is the consequence of the low amplitude of the vibration of its molecules compared to those of the skin.
And he will point out that the compact appearance of the chrome-plated object is illusory since the atomic nuclei are as separate from each other as the Stars of a Galaxy.
An Earth expert in physiological optics will say to you that the real brightness of the object is about ten times larger than the apparent brightness, but that, when the light crosses our eye, the crystalline lens and the vitreous humour absorb almost all the photons, and so only a very reduced luminous energy arrives at the retina.
An Earth physician will smile if you ask him how the light (of the flame) arrives at the cerebral cortex, and he will explain why the light never arrives at the brain, but rather that the photons, when striking the retina, induce codified impulses which are transmitted by the neurons of the optic nerve in the form of an electric message, in the form of a code, so that the resemblance between the butane flame and the message our brain receives from the retina is the same as that between a grazing cow and the letters that make up its name.

And finally a neuropsychiatrist will tell you in very vague terms (for he himself does not know many steps of the process) how the brain combines the millions of codified impulses into one synthesised perception. The only image we have of the mysterious lighter and the flame which exist apart from us is a sensory illusion.

Indeed: such an image of the lighter, however familiar it may be to us, has as much in common with the true object as the letters D A-F-F-O-D-I-L have with the plant they designate (they = these letters ndt).

The OEMII (the man) must thus rid himself of these mental images ingrained since childood, about things, colours, sounds etc... Beings of every social group we have encountered, connected to various OYAA (Planets) with which we have been in contact, and including us, you the OEMII of the Earth and we the OEMII of Ummo, realised this was necessary, and gradually scientists from various civilisations are bringing to light the true basis of our WAAM. Where are humans on this scale? Does the mathematical model of the Universe put forward by Earth physicists, with its relativity theory, quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics an accurate description of the truth ? By presenting our WAAM theory to you, you will be able to judge the differences for yourselves. We observed that the OEMII (the man) of OYAGAA (Earth) which you call " man on the street " not initiated to Earth physics, has a very primitive concept of space and the universe we call WAAM.

Since he was a UUGEEYIE (child) he was educated to accept as valid the deformed image of the external world our senses offer us. Just a if, as a child, he had been locked up in a bare room, without being allowed to see his parents, who would only have taught him the letters and syllables of an Earth language. The child could get the impression while looking at the typographical characters that furniture, animals, trees and other objects expressed by these graphical symbols have the shape of the letters which represent them.

The Earth OEMII thinks of Space as a " scalar continuum " in all directions. From this image of space, you worked out (initiated by Euclid) a whole geometry based on abstractions such as the point, the line, and the plane. You finished by accepting that POINT, LINE and PLANE really represent the true components of the WAAM, although using a mental abstraction.

This original vice, not yet corrected, is costing you a considerable delay in the comprehension of the physical world.

Indeed: when you innocently accepted the existence of Euclidian three-dimensional space, Earth mathematicians such as GAUSS, RIEMANN, BOLYAI and LOBATSCHEWSKY had the brilliant intuition of the possibility of extending the restricted Euclidian criteria by working out a new geometry for an N-Space.

And although the human mind cannot visualise a body of more than three dimensions, mathematics makes it possible to overcome this mental hurdle.

But do these mathematical models of elliptic and hyperbolic multidimensional geometries accurately represent the reality of our WAAM, or are they only " entéléchies " (NdR : realisation of the essential element of something, completed act of vision: borrowed from Aristotle), created by mathematicians?

The relativity hypothesis of the German Einstein at first adopts the criterion of the Russian Minkowsky, who conceives time as an additional dimension, with the intuition of a tetradimensional space-universe. The Earth OEMII took a gigantic step in breaking with the previous intuitive idea of a three-dimensional cosmos.

But, is that how it really is, our SPACE - COSMOS. Absolutely not : Our image of the WAAM (cosmos) i.e. space, differs on a fundamental level from that which you have elaborated.. And it is precisely when it comes to dimensions that the divergence is strongest. What is more, contradictions you observe between relativity physics and quantum mechanics are produced by a fundamental error. They are the result of errors at the most basic level.

At this point, a footnote is needed for some observations.

1 First of all we point out that our idea of space, as opposed to the Earth conception, rests on several mathematical fundaments different from yours. It is not necessary to go into detail about our mathematical symbols; such a superficial problem is easily solved by a suitable transcription (conversion from base 12 to base 10), but it will not be simple for you to understand our algorithms relating to WUUA WAAM (mathematical of Physical Space) without first following a complete initiation which would take many months for even the Earth initiates in mathematics.

There is a reason: when it comes to analysing the properties of space, the normal postulates of mathematical logic, which is familiar to you and to us besides, are not useful to us. As you know, formal logic accepts the criterion you name "law of of non-contradiction"(according to which any proposal is necessarily true or false). In our WUUA WAAM (mathematics of Physical Space) this postulate must be rejected. One then has recourse to a type of multivalent logic that our specialists call UUWUUA IES (logical tetravalent mathematics) according to which any proposal can adopt four values indifferently:
- AIOOYAA (TRUE - CORRECT)
- AIOOYEEDOO (FALSE, ABSURD)
- AIOOYA AMMIE (can be translated: True outside from The Waam) (NdR: out of our conventional dimensions)
- AIOOYAU (untranslatable in Earth language).
Even if we do not obtain anything from divalent Earth logic, we do use it in our everyday life or the study of the macrophysical phenomena.
We can offer you the concepts of the WAAM. It is possible, and we will limit ourselves to a system in which infinitesimal calculus will work as well as integral calculus, topology, tensor and vector calculus, graph theory and operational research, so familiar to Earth people.

For your convenience, when we the use of mathematical algorithms is necessary, we will endeavour to represent it to you using an algebra and notations familiar to you.

2 ° Until now, we did not reveal this type of information to any Earth scientist since the theoretical explanations communicated to various mathematicians and physicists were directed towards other fields of Microphysics and Mathematical Theory of networks.

The current discovery by some Earth scientists of this concept of physics would cause a step backwards from the required goal (because this progress would be disproportionate to the desired goal) and could be translated into extremely dangerous technological applications given the current state of the Earth's Social Network which is unbalanced.

Finally we decided to make you very wisely aware of only some aspects of our theory of UXGIAM WAAM (real physical space) If a hypothetical Earth scientist Earth read these lines, the formal logician in her would refuse to accept a testimony which, coming allegedly from extraterrestrial OEMII, would appear to her to be pure fantasy.

3 ° After what we have just said, one could ask an important question: how do we, the OEMII of UMMO, know that our model of UXGIIGIAM WAAM (real physical space) is the true one, and that for instance the Earth model of RIENMANN is not?
We are certain that our model, based on the concept of IBOZOO UU (we will further explain this concept), is true since the experimental results tally perfectly with the results predicted by the theory.
The fact that we travel by changing the three-dimensional system of reference - which enables us to move inside our Galaxy with the possibility of modifying the phases of what you call "subatomic particles " (which, as you will see, are nothing more the IBOZOO UU directed in a particular way) - confirms our theory of the WAAM once more.
What is more, our theory coincides (give or take several nuances) with the theses worked out by civilisations living on other OYAA (Planets) with whom we have had contact and who are at an advanced state in their scientific research.

OUR THEORY OF UXGIIGIAM WAAM (SPACE).

When our brothers arrived in Earth year 1950 on OYAGAA (Earth), and after having learned the French language and gone for the first time to the library located at 58 rue Richelieu in Paris, they were surprised to read in the Earth mathematics texts in the library that, for instance, concepts like the POINT, the LINE and the PLANE continued to be considered by you as simple abstractions of an underlying reality of the UNIVERSE.

Thus when the mathematicians of the Earth define a point as a family of curves or as an ordered set of N numbers in an N space, they have the intuition of the structure of a scalar space with N dimensions in which the point is defined inside a frame of reference by its corresponding co-ordinates.
According to these ideas, a line will be a set of points with a one-to-one mapping with the set of real numbers, so that the distance between two points of a space Rn defined as basic, can remain defined.
Thus between two points A, B, of an N-space: being co-ordinates of two points A (X1, X2,X3... Xn), B (Y1, Y2, Y3... Yn), so that the framework of a multidimensional scalar space is thus defined.

This rigid model of the mathematics of Space does not satisfy a number of current physicists at all: that is true despite the fact that many others continue to accept the existence of this SPACE independent of the matter and the energy it contains. Then you invented another thing: the Space of the Phases. For you real space contains subatomic particles (another error as we will see further).
You postulate that each particle (NEUTRON, MESON, etc) must occupy in a given moment a position (POINT), but you must define the particle not only in terms of its position but also by its momentum.

Then you imagine an N-SPACE of six dimensions in which each particle is defined by six dimensions.

You call this " entéléchie " space phases. You can then imagine an elementary volume made up of confined spaces, the limit of which would be a point. The elementary volume would be:
T = dx.dy.dz.dpx.dpy.dpz according to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: dx.dpx > H; dy.dpy > H; dz.dpz > H, so that elementary volume will be T > H cubed.
(H is Planck's constant)

You name this elementary volume of order H cubed point of the space of the phases, since the infinitesimal point is shown when confronting intuition or physical significance, violating the uncertainty principle and since an elementary particle (electron, hyperon, neutrino, positron...) will be localised in an unspecified face of the elementary volume in question (phasic point) but never at the central point.

Our conception of UXGIGIAM (space) is radically different. Let us start with this concept of dimension which differs from the idea that you have made for yourselves. We will try to use symbols and concepts for your brothers who are unfamiliar the WUUA (mathematics)

You conceive of a UNIVERSE formed by a SCALAR SPACE i.e. : a space as it exists to our senses, in which the image of DIMENSION entails the image of a line or scalar.

Space, then, would be like an " IMMENSE VOLUME " and the COSMOS something like a SPHERE of positive (D59_FIG3, F2) or negative (D59_FIG3, F3) curvature.
The most intelligent among the Earth people suppose at least a curve inside the fourth dimension and identify the WAAM with RIEMANN's multidimensional space.
OUR UNIVERSE would then be like a positive or negative HYPERSPHERE but DIMENSION always being identified by you as a line or a scalar.

At the interior of this model of COSMOS you would put particles, atoms; forming Galaxies, gravity fields, magnetics and electrostatics, in short, Energy.

We, on the contrary, know that the WAAM (cosmos) is composed of a network of IBIZOO UU. We conceive SPACE as an associated set of angular factors.

For us the line in space does not exist, as we explain further, so the concept of OAWOO (dimension) takes on a different meaning for us. Such dimensions are associated not with scalar magnitudes (as the Earth people think), but on the contrary with angular magnitudes. (It is curious to note, for instance, that in their blindness, the physicists of the Earth do not give an angle a dimensional characteristic.)

If you were children in a school, perhaps we would use a rough example as a comparisons. The universe is like a "swarm of dragonflies " whose wings form different angles:

All these dragonflies fly in such a way that not one has its wings oriented identically to any other. In other words, there will not be a single pair of dragonflies which, at a given moment, will be able to be superimposed so that the wings and the abdomens match exactly.. But, as we already said, this image is excessively simplified and distant in its analogy.
First of all each dragonfly occupies a place in space at each moment. I.e.: its inertia and centres of gravity occupy definite zones (according to this example).
An IBOZOO UU does not occupy any definite position, we cannot say of it that there is a probability of it being located at any one point.
In addition this flying insect has MASS and VOLUME, (at least in our minds) the IBOZOO UU is a particle without MASS or corporality. In a first conceptual approximation we could say of it that it is a set of oriented axes.
The angles formed by these axes are more important in such a set than the axes themselves (a mathematical fiction).

The dragonflies of our infinite swarm live in time, move in short intervals of time, infinitesimal distances. The IBOZOO UU does not exist in time, it IS time. (one of its angles is the magnitude TIME as we will explain it in another report with more explanations); to be more precise: what we call INFINITESIMAL INTERVAL OF TIME (dt) is only the difference in angular orientation between two dependent IBOZOO.

If after this summary explanation you visualise our model of space by imagining for example that space is a " dense mass of particles similar to atoms " you are in error, since the particles of a gas such as you know it occupy probable positions in an enclosure, whereas that is not the case with the IBOZOO UU.
You should not either identify such a space with the ancient concept of ETHER thrown out by the theory of relativity, since the NETWORK OF IBOZOO UU is not at all an elastic medium in which are immersed the atoms of bodies.
You could also ask us: in relation to what universal reference axis are directed the angles of the IBOZOO UU? Naturally NOT WITH ANY. There is no axis of reference in the WAAM for that would suppose a real line in the COSMOS, and such a line, as we indicated, is a FICTION. We can only refer to the angle of one of the secondary axes of an IBOZOO UU compared to another, arbitrarily adopted as a reference. We inform you that you should not imagine that subatomic particles are immersed inside this set of IBOZOO UU. Quite simply because any particle (electron, meson or graviton) is necessarily an IBOZOO UU directed in a particular way compared to the others.

In conclusion : we also conceive of a space of N DIMENSIONS. MASS, for example, is also a " curve of this multidimensional space ". It is the same for DISTANCES within the WAAM. Only our concepts of magnitude, curvature and distance are radically different from those of the Earth people. Thus when we represent Space graphically as a Line, a Point, we do as you do because such images are familiar to us. But we know that they are pure fiction.

THE CONCEPT OF IBOZOO UU

The WAAM which we know is a BOUND SET (AYUU) or NETWORK Of IBOZOO UU
It is necessary to give you the most faithful representation possible of the true nature of the IBOZOO UU, which has nothing to do with MATHEMATICAL POINT, nor with a PARTICLE, nor with a QUANTUM of energy according to Earth conceptions. You must thus rid your mind of familiar images such as the POINT and linear DIMENSION.
If you have a mathematical background you know the concept of HYPERSHERE in N SPACES.
We can represent such a geometrical body analytically. Its corresponding equation is familiar to students.
If we represent the magnitudes defined in N axes by a1, a2, a3... aN. The ray of the hypersphere will be defined.

As we cannot represent such a HYPERSHERE graphically, we will suppose a three-dimensional SPHERE whose axes are directed orthogonally. We try to choose a (symbolic) mathematical model which represents the IBOZOO UU. Keep in mind: when we refer to a radius vector for example, do not suppose that this ray physically materialises inside the IBOZOO UU.

We consider in the sphere of figure D59_FIG10 an OAWOO (with this name we refer in the sphere to the Earth idea of AXIS, as well as that of the VECTOR, with its attributes of modulus, origin and extremity). In this case you would translate OAWOO as radius vector U, whereas the IOAWOO is an angle

If we consider a HYPERSPHERE with N dimensions, we can conceive as many other OAWOO (RADIUS VECTORS) as there are dimensions.
That is to say U1, U2, U3... Un, whose respective orientations are orthogonal, i.e. that they form the angle of p/2 between them.

Viewed thusly, the IBOZOO UU could be interpreted as a closed multidimensional space, and you would start again to imagine it having its points, lines, planess, hyperplanes, immersed volumes and hypervolumes. Nothing is further from the real concept of the IBOZOO UU. When we refer, within the IBOZOO UU, to an OAWOO (AXIS) and its orientation, it is clear that such an orientation does not make geometrical sense without a frame of reference.
Thus when one of you pictures a line in space, it must be defined in terms of a system of axes (which you call Cartesian) so that the line is defined by its modulus (expressed by six sides of the axes) and by the cosines with the axes: Cos(Alpha), Cos(Beta) and Cos(Gamma).

But you can see that this system of reference was selected arbitrarily within Euclidean Space which you imagined. It is very important that you see the difference compared to the IBOZOO UU.

It is not possible to choose a system of reference within the IBOZOO UU itself. Such a system of reference must be in relation to another IBOZOO UU, arbitrarily selected. (Thus in figure 11, if we suppose two IBOZOO UU (P) and (H), it would be nonsense to refer to the cosines cos(Alpha) cos(Beta) cos(Gamma) that the OAWOO UU forms with an ideal trihedron whose origin would be the " CENTER " of the HYPERSPHERE H.
Thus we can to only refer to the angle Theta IOAWOO that Ur of H forms with the OAWOO (RADIUS VECTOR) Ua of P.
It is precisely this IOAWOO Theta (ANGLE - DIMENSION) that bestows all the exceptional qualities on the IBOZOO UU.
It will be necessary as of now that you make a mental effort to carry out a psychological shift so that each time in physics that we speak of MAGNITUDE, the image of a SCALAR does not spring into your conscience, instead of the IOAWOO (ANGLE that the hypothetical radius vectors of two IBOZOO UU form between them).

It is nonsense TO ISOLATE, in an effort of mental abstraction, an IBOZOO UU in order to study it. We COULD EXPRESS it , by translating the POSTULATE known to our physicists: AN ISOLATED IBOZOO UU DOES NOT EXIST.

That this postulate violates the traditional proposals of what Earth people call MATHEMATICAL SET THEORY. Since if I belongs to W, element I (IBOZOO UU) belongs to the set W (WAAM), the isolated element I is:

I = Æ (an IBOZOO UU CONSIDERED AS A SET IS EMPTY)

We will explain a little to the OEMII unfamiliar with mathematics: naturally an IBOZOO UU is not " VISIBLE ", even using the most sophisticated laboratory instruments imaginable.
You can however object: How the scientists of UMMO know that this entity exists if they cannot detect it? The use of the word " detect " is inappropriate here. If we managed to deduce the existence of the IBOZOO UU, it is because the physical model worked out by its supposed existence answers all explanations and problems regarding the behaviour of Matter and Energy and, what is even more important: it offers a plausible explanation of extrasensory phenomena and telepathic communications through the BUUWEE BIAEEI (HUMAN COLLECTIVE SPIRIT).

Though such entities are not visible, for the purposes of comprehension, one could represent the WAAM as an immense network of small spheres (D59_FG12), each one of them being an IBOZOO UU.
They are each of a different colour, but inside a set of colours we could select all those that differ by a shade of the same colour; a different shade of green, for example).

From this metaphor (coloured spheres), we can say that that the set of IBOZOO UU are differentiated not only by the angle IOAWOO, but also by their respective OAWOO (radius vectors) which they form with one of the IBOZOO UU taken as a reference, but whose field of rotation is the HYPERPLANE H (since we cannot draw a hyperplane, we will suppose in the D59_FG13 that it is about a meridian plan P (NdR: sketch missing) .
The IBOZOO UU whose radius vectors turn in another meridian plane are codified by another colour. Orange for example; D59_FG13 (missing figure)... (NdR: we found the Spanish translation of this somewhat sibylline paragraph; we nevertheless reproduced it here as is)

If we select, as we said to you, all the IBOZOO UU that exist in the WAAM to which we attributed the colour green, we would observe that, ordered mathematically, they would form an OXOOIAEE (chain of IBOZOO UU):

In other words: having considered the IU belonging to W (subset of W), we can establish a one-to-one mapping between these IBOZOO UU of the OXOIAEE (CHAINS IN the SHAPE Of RINGS) and the infine number of angles which a radius vector can describe in a plane.
It is not that such IBOZOO UU form an endless chain in the WAAM and are topologically located in an ordered series. NO, it is our senses, as we will explain further, that carry out this task of ordering. (a Earth example will help you better understand: when you evaluate the amount of money in a bank account, you can represent the dollars, pounds sterling or pesos in an order, so that you can count them. But this ordering, you know that it is an illusion).

The immediate components of this chain D and P differ between them as the infinitesimal angle dq (in figure D59_FG14, we have exaggerated the magnitude of dq for purposes of comprehension).

CONCEPT OF GEOIDE: STRAIGHT LINE.

A hypothetical observer looking at the whole of the OXOOIAEE (chain of IBOZOO UU) from the IBOZOO UU &&(Si) would see this chain as a STRAIGHT LINE.
A hypothetical traveller leaving &&Si in a " straight line " through the WAAM (COSMOS) would necessarily arrive at the IBOZOO UU from which he started.
In other words: what our senses interpret as a linear magnitude, i.e. a line or as you would say "a linear scalar ", is nothing but an OXOOIAEE (CHAIN Of IBOZOO UU). It is the illusory mental image which results from our brain synthesising and ordering this set of IBOZOO UU (which in the WAAM are actually in " disorder " and without definite position).
At the risk of repeating ourselves, we underline the fallacy of thinking that the IBOZOO UU of this chain are ordered in straight lines in the UNIVERSE. It is not so. We say that such IBOZOO UU AIOOYA exist (they are dependent on each other in the WAAM).

If we consider on Figure D59_FG15 a Earth observer related to the IBOZOO UU (T) and on our planet UMMO an observer related to (U) we say that there is a distance L between the Earth and UMMO because in relation to an arbitrary reference, there is an ANGULAR difference between the two IBOZOO UU. (An angular difference which implies the existence of an infinite number of IBOZOO UU between them).

But if we consider this same figure in relation to another reference, we will discover a second chain of IBOZOO UU, so that this angular difference will have varied. We could then say that the distance between UMMO and the EARTH is different.
< L since (Q' U - Q' T) < (qu - Qt)

We can conclude then by saying that we define the straight line and its magnitude [ editors' reminder: " .... each time in physics that we speak about MAGNITUDE, the image of a SCALAR should not spring to mind rather than the IOAWOO (ANGLE that the hypothetical radius vectors of two IBOZOO UU form between them"] as a chain of IBOZOO UU immersed in the WAAM such that their OAWOO (RADIUS VECTORS) differ successively from an angle dq, and are all directed in a hyperplane H.
A borderline case of a straight line would be the OXOOIAEE WAAM (which can be translated as UNIVERSAL GEOIDE) (Figure D59_FG14). Do not think for a moment that a POINT ON THIS LINE can be represented by an IBOZOO UU, for we have already said that an IBOZOO UU in itself does not make any sense. In any case we define an elementary segment as a dependent pair of IBOZOO UU to refute once and for all the concept of geometrical point introduced into your brain by Earth mathematicians. If you did not understand that, it is that you have not assimilated the true meaning of our physics, so infused are you with Earth mathematical notations.
Let E be set of geometrical points according to an N-Space of RIEMANN (Earth Mathematician) in which each point is P (x1 x2 x3... xn) (P). Let W be the whole of the IBOZOO UU of the WAAM (I).

We say that: If P Ì E (every point belongs to E) and I Ì W (every IBOZOO UU I belongs to W)
We see that: W Ç E = Æ, i.e. that the intersection of E and W is empty.

If D and D' are two sets of IBOZOO UU which imply distances measured by an observer under different angles, one observes that D Ç D' = Æ

TIME AND MAGNETIC, GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS.

The IBOZOO UU is much more than one factor that gives an accurate representation of cosmic distances. Our WAAM (UNIVERSE) is a set like the framework from which we receive the multiple factors that appear to our senses and to our instruments in the static fields of Forces.
Thus, we suspect the presence of a close Star by the influence which it exerts on a distinct mass. We then define this influence as a gravitational field, or we detect traces of electromagnetic waves whose sources can be a nebula whose ions of plasma move periodically.
The Universe is presented to us as a substrate of phenomena as familiar as speed, force or the slow movement of time.

In particular, this magnitude Time has particular importance to us. In the next pages that we will give you, we will inform you about this particularity. We will show you for example that one can compare Time to a series of IBOZOO UU whose axes are directed orthogonally compared to the OAWOO (radius vectors) which implies distance, and that it is even possible that, if the inversion of its axes is adequate, that an observer in a new frame of reference will perceive as a distance what was measured as an interval of time in the old reference.
You will then understand why an event which occurs far from us (for instance on UMMO) cannot occur simultaneously with another Earth event.
You will also understand why a hypothetical object moving at the limiting speed (which you speed of light) will shorten its distance on the axis of displacement to a pair of IBOZOO UU (distance that tends towards zero but is not null as a LORENTZ (Earth Mathematician) transformation notes in error).

In any case we will define an elementary segment as a dependent pair of IBOZOO UU.

What you call a subatomic particle, like a neutrino, a meson or an antiproton, with various attributes such as mass, charge and spin, are only multiple orientations of an IBOZOO UU. If the Earth physicists continue to spend their time on detection, evaluation and classification of all the possible particles, it will take them a billion years to finish since this classification is as sterile as giving a name to each infinitesimal angle under which we can see a star over the course of a day.

THE AXIAL NETWORK OF THE IBOZOO UU

A summary definition of the final definition of the IBOZOO UU that we will give to you at the end is this one:
An IBOZOO UU is a elementary cosmic entity integrated by a beam of oriented axes WHICH CANNOT CROSS EACH OTHER, bound to a whole of IBOZOO UU independent one from the other in relation to their angularity.

You can see that we are gradually adjusting each time more accurately the authentic concept of IBOZOO UU defined by our specialists on UMMO. We thought that to bring you an exact definition from the outset would have been excessively confusing, especially taking into consideration that no theory approaching ours in its formalism exists on the planet EARTH.
Observe also that through the translation of this definition, we expressed that the IBOZOO UU integrate a beam of oriented axes which cannot cross each other.
This is very difficult to understand if you to continue to maintain the mental image of Euclidian space with its points and lines. Naturally if the IBOZOO UU were like a sphere or a hypersphere (D59_FG10), in its centre the different axes could CROSS EACH OTHER at a point. (For example the radius vectors would cross in the center). Therefore this mathematical model does not accurately represent the IBOZOO UU.

If we chose the model of a sphere in our description, it was only to obtain a more faithful translation of the concepts by using mathematical algorithms, notations and geometrical concepts very familiar to Earth people. (It is a little like what you do when, for the purposes of simplification, you consider the Earth to be an ideal sphere whereas you know that it is an deformed ellipsoid. (isosceles Ellipsoid with three axes)).
Let us then suppose a sphere which would constitute one of the infinite hyperplane meridians of a hypersphere of order N = 4.

If you are not familiar with this concept, imagine that if we give the name "meridian plane" to the section of a sphere which passes through its center, a sphere of order N = 3, for a hypersphere of dimension 4, its section will be precisely a figure of N - I dimensions, i.e. a sphere. It is necessary to remember the concept of the ANGLE in a HYPERSPACE.

Q = Q(P,Q)
Let P and Q be two HYPERPLANES defined by the co-ordinates U = (U0 U1 U2... Un) and V = (V0 V1 V2 .....Vn)
These two HYPERPLANES determine a beam G.
Thus in this beam G there are TWO HYPERPLANES P ¥and Q ¥which are tangent with the fundamental quadratic S.

The angle Q = Q(P,Q) (in which 0<Q<P) between these two HYPERPLANES P and Q is defined by:

Q = Q(P,Q) = 1/ì Log R (P, Q, P ¥, Q ¥)

This angle is defined by the equations: (we cannot represent Q on an image. We reproduce only the projection of Qp of Q. Qp will be expressed by two meridian planes in the case of Q for an N-space of the order N = 4.)

In that which E = +1 since we suppose a HYPERSPHERE of positive curvature.

Let us remember the difference between SPHERE of positive curvature and a spherical surface of negative curvature, which helps us to understand the concepts of HYPERSPHERE of curve E = +1 and E = -1 (D59_FIG 19).

Therefore: when R (P Q, P ¥Q ¥) = -1 we consider that the two HYPERPLANES are orthogonal.

If you replace the concept of linear OOWAOO (radius vector) linear of our former simplified model, by that of the HYPERPLANE of the order N = 4 and if you imagine these HYPERPLANES of reference not in the IBOZOO UU studied, but in another that is dependent on it, we can imagine three directing cosines which we will call COSY COSX COSW which define other angles for us (YXW) which we call IOAWOO (dimensional angles) . The angles will define each one the respective values of three-dimensional space such as we conceive it. It is supposed that an infinitesimal variation in the values of these directing cosines occasionne?involves/brings about a dependent pair of IBOZOO UU.

At this point, we will use for those Earth brothers not very well versed in mathematics an analogy of the WAAM (universe) represented by an immense swarm of dragonflies. Suppose that these insects are of different colours, no two of the same colour or shade. They fly in such a manner that we cannot know where one at any given moment for they are at the same time here and everywhere. They are green, magenta, orange, blue, etc. Let us suppose now that our vision is so acute that at a glance we can locate the million dragonflies of only one colour (green for example) and that we also have the ability to order them by shade, from light to dark green... But it is here that the brain tricks us. Instead of perceiving an ordered swarm of insects in a rich range of shades, we imagine a cold and abstract straight line: the brightest, more luminous pair of dragonflies at the near end, and the darker blue-green dragonflies at the remotest point of this immense line D59_FG21 (NDS : drawing illegible in the photocopied document).

To understand our Physical model of the WAAM, the Earth people must perfect other mental images different from those taught since childhood. You must study other plurivalent forms of mathematical Logic. You must also understand that this image of a Physical World composed of atoms, themselves composed of a multitude of subatomic particles occupying at every moment a probabilistic position, is an insufficient and shallow ; you must reject this absurd mental image which consists in saying that a particle moving at an instantaneous speed V constitutes the material passage of this same particle of point P at another adjacent P', infinitesimally distant, in an interval of elementary time dt. It is necessary to adopt the real concept of speed which implies various rotations in two paired IBOZOO UU, rotations by which the first IBOZOO UU of the pair, by reversing its axes, ceases being a subatomic particle, while the second directs its OAWOO (axes, radii, vectors) to transform itself into a subparticle (as you call it) identical to the first (thus occurs an illusory effect of translation, a little like if one of two Earth magicians ten meters apart on a stage put a rabbit in his pocket only to have it come out of his partner's pocket a few moments later).
Any intelligent person will understand that the rabbit did not travel mysteriously through the air, and that it was two identical rabbits.

We are surprised that after having studied Wave mechanics exhaustively and having observed that all phenomena relating to time can be reduced to a series of sinusoidal functions, i.e. cyclic, Earth Physicists did not have the intuition of an angular WAAM (universe). But a correction of these concepts at the present time would hardly be beneficial for you. It is much better than Earth physicists slowly discover the truth by leaving time for spiritual values to supercede aggressive instincts

On image D59_FG21 (drawing visible in the RIBERA book, page 197)) you can see in a symbolic way how the brain carries out a synthesis by classifying the IBOZOO UU in an ordered scale according to their angular magnitude compared to one taken as a reference. When the OEMII looks in a specific direction, her visual field includes all the IBOZOO UU whose OAWOO are directed under different different angles in a Field that you could mathematically represent as a HYPERPLANE.

This simplistic image is intended for the OEMII not very well versed in mathematics. The initiates will understand that the IBOZOO UU are not located in definite points, and also that the term DISORDER (or ENTROPY) is not appropriate for this model either.

If green spheres symbolise a visual field in a specific direction, the blue or red ones represent other possible fields as the human eye points in different directions. To say that the IBOZOO UU are like small spheres or " that between them exists a vacuum " or that they " are tangent within a dense space filled with IBOZOO UU ", does not make sense. Such mental images are those which appear to an UUGEEYIE (child) when one speaks to him for the first time on UMMO about the design of SPACE composed by the IBOZOO UU. Its childlike mentality, accustomed to familiar perceptions, tends to materialise this concept of IBOZOO UU and to assign an existence to it.

In image (drawing visible in the RIBERA book, page 197) you can see how the image of a segment of a line appears in the field of conscience, a codified translation of the stimuli of the retina. Such a stimuli changes into the mental image of DISTANCE when between the eye of the observer and the visible object there exists no matter.

THE CONCEPT OF THE OAWOO

Having defined the IBOZOO UU as an elementary entity composed by a beam of orthogonal axes which cannot cross each other, we intentionally introduced (for teaching purposes) a concept which you must reject: that expressed by a very familiar word on Earth: AXIS.
If you associate our word OAWOO (AXIS or DIRECTION) with a straight line that has direction, we must start over again because you will not have understood any of our preceding explanations.

Obviously there is a serious obstacle there for we speak different mathematical languages, languages conditioned by a set of different psychological perceptions between you and us.

So we invite the laymen in mathematics to imagine the IBOZOO UU as a series of axes (indefinite, ideal straight lines), whose DIRECTIONS could never be compared to axes or real or ideal lines.

We wish to insist on the fact that an isolated IBOZOO UU is illogical to conceive, i.e. that it has no reality. We say AIOOIEDOO (false concept, absurdity, has no reality).

We will take an example for the laymen of the Earth.

We will obtain a small CLOSED ENCLOSURE. A series of such vases would form a chain of sealed enclosures, as in D59_FG24


Before we continue, it would be useful to go into more detail about the concept of a STRAIGHT LINE. The distance from one point to another must be interpreted as a succession of IBOZOO UU whose EIDIIU (angles) or more precisely, whose IOAWOO (1) differ between them as dq. (see D59-fg17). The difference between EIDIIU and IOAWOO is very important: EIDIIU is our translation of the familiar concept of an angle. Thus an EIDIIU is the right angle formed by a vertical wall and the floor of a room.
IOAWOO would be " the ANGLE " formed by two OAWOO (" AXES ") of two associated IBOZOO UU (D59_FG11); if in both cases we use the word " ANGLE ", whereas they are two very different concepts, it is because there does not exist in your language a corresponding word (NdR: To our knowledge the concept of "angle "formed by two axes in space, axes which do not intersect, does not exist in our geometry, which requires, for the definition of these two axes, a projection onto planes, or the measurement of two angles compared to a trihedron of reference. Which geometrician will formulate the IOAWOO?)

We said to you that between two points (D59_FG15) we can consider not one, but an infinity of different chains of IBOZOO UU (for various three-dimensional reference systems). In other words, it would appear that one of them is actually " geodesic " (the shortest line a body would follow between two points of a hypersphere located within a framework of four dimensions).

But this is insufficient. Any other arc located in this sphere (representating for instance a larger apparent distance as in D59_FG25 B) is represented by the SAME chain of IBOZOO UU, which it would be incorrect to qualify as GEODESIC; we thus prefer to qualify it as GEOIDIC, even if the two words have an similar etymology on Earth.

THE CONCEPT OF TIME.

The passage of time induces in the OEMII a psychological type of perception. It is another illusion. Within our organism a whole complex series of periodic phenomena occurs, from blood circulation to the metabolism of fats. If we close our eyes, we continue to perceive the passage of time thanks to the rhythmic periodicity of these thousands of physiological phenomena.

But the conception of time for the Earth physicist differs on a fundamental level from that of psychobiologists. You see Time as a dimension, at least it is thus accepted by the followers of EINSTEIN's relativity theory.
Our concept of TIME undoubtedly presents new ideas which are unknown for you. First of all we cannot regard Time as a dimension or continuum, as you do. It is not that time is quantified, but one cannot conceive a moment as a point on the axis of time. The interval dt, although it can tend towards zero, could never be perceived as small as we would like to.
There is another aspect to this question we wish to underline. You consider that the highest speed a subparticle in the WAAM (Cosmos) can reach is 299,780 km/h (speed of light) and you regard this speed as " CONSTANT ".
This is not a poor measurement. Indeed: it is this same speed that we recorded... within this same three-dimensional framework.

But all one needs to do is change framework or three-dimensional system so that this limiting Speed changes remarkably up to the point where the only reference which can reflect the change of axis is the measurement of this speed or constant, C.

We will thus have a family of values thus: C0 C1 C2 C3... Ci ..............Cn, which extends from C0 = 0 (zero) to Cn = ¥(infinite), each one representing a definite system of reference.

In the first case, (speed of light zero), definite phenomena that you associate with parapsychology are produced, such as for instance telepathic communication. The WAAM analysed under this three-dimensional system of reference has an absolute uniformity, you would say maximum Entropy (even if this state of MAXIMUM ENTROPY or DEGRADATION could occur in any system of reference where the speed of light is " NONZERO ").

In the borderline case of infinite speed of light, the WAAM can be considered as nonexisting, for one could compare it to an identification of every IBOZOO UU with itself, i.e. with only one IBOZOO UU which, as you know, does physically exist.
It is necessary that you understand that before continuing further, even if it is difficult to accept because of the logical reasoning to which you are accustomed.

If you imagine in space an infinite range of small spheres or small balls, each one of different colour and a different shade from the others, you will then have a rough image of the WAAM.
Imagine now that you locate two spheres of exactly the same colour. Your logical mechanisms would tell you that these two small balls are in different places, that they represent different entities. In short, they are two balls, and this plurality of spheres differentiated by colour fails miserably.
But if we translate this reasoning into the cosmos, if you locate two IBOZOO UU which were until now distinct since their " axes " (OAWOO) were directed in different directions, and if now you look at them in the perspective that both IBOZOO UU are equal; you will then have to use another type of reasoning dissociated from divalent logic and affirm that these " two " IBOZOO UU are " the same " IBOZOO UU.

Indeed: a pair of IBOZOO UU that appears different, in a system of reference, for instance a neutron and a pion, by changing reference axes, these two subparticles which in the other framework seemed very distant for the observer, belonging even to two different galaxies, must be regarded as the same IBOZOO UU in another three-dimensional system.

But the probability that this occurs for a pair of IBOZOO UU is practically zero when the new system of reference differs " angularly " very little from the former one.

That is, that we consider in an IBOZOO UU the four " axes " (OAWOO) (and once again drawing attention to the true concept of OAWOO) which we call OAWOO UXGIGII for it is they that represent the three-dimensional frame of reference (D59_FG27).

OAWOO UXGIGII which in reality do not exist, for they are as conventional as a symbol, but they a tool for the mathematician to fix the position of the true OAWOO.
If the true OAWOO (U) oscillates inside this ideal framework, imagine now a new system of reference consisting of TWO OAWOO UXGIGII, each one of them forming a 90 ° angle with the four former ones (see D59_FG27).
This new framework of action of a real T (OAWOO) and those previously defined, respectively define SPACE and TIME D59_FG28:

You can see that the OAWOO (vector axes) V and T which define SPACE AND TIME have different degrees of freedom. The first can cross IOAXOO (Angle-Space) in three different directions which correspond to three typical dimensions of SPACE, the second being restricted to moving on only one plane.

Two IBOZOO UU whose axes OAXOO T1 and T2 differ by an angle such that there does not exist in the WAAM another IBOZOO UU between the two, will define the smallest interval of TIME. We call this interval UIWIIOO (INSTANT) (D59_FG29).

What does the flow of time consist of? Is it an illusion? Take any object: a fruit. Even if have not yet developed the concept of subatomic particles yet, we have already suggested in other documents that each atomic component is actually an IBOZOO UU. The fruit will be composed of water, carbohydrate, proteins and other organic chemical components. Those in turn will be composed of NIIO A (atoms) and these by subparticles; each one of them being an IBOZOO UU with its OAXOO (axes) directed in a particular way.
When we measure on our watch a one microsecond interval: is the orange we have in our hand the same on we held a moment before? An Earth chemist will say: actually it is not the same because in its core, in its cells, the process of metabolism has modified its characteristics.
The physicist will say: NO, its electrons have varied their position in their orbitals. But if we ask him now if these electrons, which have a different position, are the same ones as before; perhaps he will answer: YES.
But it is an error: there was a jump of the IBOZOO UU which before represented the electron E1 of orbital O1 of the atom A1, and it is not the same one.

A layman in physics will better understand this example. Imagine a frame formed by a mosaic of electric bulbs (D59_FG30).

At time T1 the bulbs to form a capital letter A are lit. But one moment afterwards, t2, time has moved. The A is the same but its components have varied. One has turned off certain bulbs and lit others. The illusion of continuity is the same, but the A seems to move along the mosaic of lamps.

One is not yet turned off when the following one starts to light up. (D59_FG31); the Eb electron of our example which was only one IBOZOO UU, becomes Ec one moment later.

If you consider the WAAM to be the integration of all the IBOZOO UU " (past, present and future"), that which call ourselves (Me, now) then we can represent it on a plane as in image D59_FG32.
If I am at a " point " P represented by an IBOZOO UU with its Tp (OAXOO) directed vertically, what will happen tomorrow? " I " will be in T'p (another IBOZOO UU) which I will call the future (1)

But; what happens on the plane of " ME, NOW " at another point separated from me by a distance D, i.e. a chain of IBOZOO UU? Quite simply that the orientation of its (OAXOO) &&Tu (axis of time) will be different. Thus I cannot say that there is simultaneity of TIME. I cannot thus say for example " NOW " something is occuring on the planet VENUS for such a concept of simultaneity does not make sense (AND SIMILARLY FOR EVERYTHING WITHIN THE SAME FRAME OF REFERENCE).

(1) By saying ME, we do not refer to an OEMII (person) composed of trillions of IBOZOO UU, but to an elementary subparticle of my organisation: a proton for example. You can see that the Earth physicist Einstein designed a universe which in some ways was not so different from that which we are describing to you. You must only replace the "SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM" "by "SET OF the IBOZOO UU. " Einstein's model also agrees with ours on other essential points. But Einstein was only unaware that what he regarded as the CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT is only so in one of the possible systems of reference (for the same three-dimensional system, the speed of light or speed limit is constant).. He was unaware that there were other three-dimensional frameworks than the one familiar to us. Our design of the WAAM explains certain contradictions that the physicists of the Earth found between quantum Mechanics and the relativity model.

It is not easy to find perceptible images of certain elements or factors (it does not seem correct to us to name them particles) which can be only conceived analytically using mathematical algorithms.

But we repeat you that certain liberties in the interest of simplifying comprehension entail a very serious risk. Thus when the teachers of an Earth child represent the atom to her as " a miniature planetary model " and incite her to represent the nucleus as a sort of " sun " and the orbiting electrons like revolving " planetoids ", the child assimilates an erroneous concept which, if it is not superceded by more advanced studies, will remain all her life and will prevent her from conceiving a Physical Cosmos nearer to reality.

We say all this to warn you against simple and erroneous preconceptions. It is very important to us that you do not identify the concept of OAWOO (AXIS or ORIENTATION of DIMENSION) with a line. Nor even with a rotating or axial vector representative of the oriented magnitudes. The OAWOO is not measurable, that is, it is not a length, such as the physicists of OYAGAA (Planet Earth) conceive it. For all these reasons we ask you not to try to identify it with the dimension LENGTH.
Undoubtedly a layman in mathematics would try through our theory to seek a PERCEPTIBLE representation of such an "AXIS " but we know that for you such a mental representation is currently impossible. That is why the graphs of this document are drawn in the form of spherical and axial representations which are as childlike as the concept of the atom explained by some humble schoolteachers.

In addition, the OAWOO IS NOT a CONVENTION, it is not a simple parameter, nor an arbitrary way of representing an IBOZOO UU. The OAWOO does not exist without imagining it related or " connected " to another OAWOO with which it forms an ELEMENTARY ANGLE that we call IOAWOO.

All the confusion resulting from our presentation of our Physical concepts to you spring from our desire to convey these ideas to you in an understandable. Apparent contradictions are inevitable, just as with the question of a Earth child, concerning how a transistor radio can receive a radio station if your answer was " the words come from the air ".

On the other hand it will be much simpler to imagine the IOAWOO (we could translate this by (" THE ANGLE FORMED BY TWO OAWOO ") if you remember how in previous documents we identified this IOAWOO with certain magnitudes which are familiar to you (LENGTH OF TIME).

Despite all this it will not be easy for you to conceive an ANGLE not formed by intersecting lines or planes. Such a model of the angle differs from Earth mathematical conventions.
In short: if you try to apply your own mental images through the orthodoxy of Formal logic, and even if we bring to you all the scientific formulation of our theory, it will be impossible for you to assimilate these concepts. This is the reason for our attempt to facilitate the comprehension of the IBOZOO UU with rough approximations.

In addition this does not seem reasonable. The unversed OEMII is accustomed to seeing objects delimited by lines, to mentally imagine angles delimited by lines and planes, and to position objects at such a point or in such a place.

It will thus be difficult for this OEMII to imagine an IBOZOO UU that cannot be defined by the three co-ordinates which define the point in Euclidean space; it will be difficult for him to imagine that in addition he has no mass, and that he cannot be compared to a changing quantity. Also that he does not have energy in him or electric charge because such concepts (MASS, ENERGY AND CHARGE) are creations of the mind associated with a particular orientation of such elements. Perhaps an expert in OYAGAA logic might define him as the non-A (*) of divalent logic (that is, WHAT DOES NOT EXIST)

But the IBOZOO UU is not a simple mathematical postulate, a " entéléchie " composed of strange conceptions of " axes " which make it possible to outline a new model of perceiving physics and cosmology.

On the contrary, we have confirmed for you the empirical validity of this design. We know that the IBOZOO UU REALLY EXISTS, but we recognise that we are unaware of other aspects of such entities and that consequently we do not have even half of the COSMOLOGICAL TRUTH, and perhaps will never arrive there even if we are approaching it in an asymptotic way.

Consequently we are not trying to make you accept this model unknown to the physicists of OYAGAA (Earth). Otherwise it would be necessary for us to lay out our logical principles as a preliminary, and we accompany these disclosures not only with their mathematical formulation but also with a certain amount of empirical evidence.
It would be childish to think that an Earth physicist would accept any premise advanced by a primarily didactic text, without a considerable amount of coherent arguments or a testimony worthy of belief. Never would the OEMII of UMMO, who remain hidden and operate discreetly, for reasons already explained, hope to be believed on the basis of mysterious telephone calls or typed documents without an identifiable signature.

In short, we try TO DESCRIBE A THEORY and not DEMONSTRATE it.

BASIC SUBPARTICLES

When we describe our models of MASS and ENERGY, it is necessary for us at every moment to establish the differences and the resemblances between the current ideas of a physicist of planet UMMO and another of OYAAGAA (EARTH).

Above all, we underline that in spite of certain differences concerning the true nature of certain factors which are familiar to you (like SPIN), we accept as valid many Earth discoveries, even if we interpret them in a different way.

To illustrate what is meant by this, here are some concrete examples of coincidences.

You have measured the Mass of the PROTON, of the ELECTRON, of many MESONS and HYPERONS, and have noted the difference in MASS of the NEUTRON and PHOTON.
We corroborate the existence of what you call PARTICLES, and we confirm that the measurement of their relative rest-mass is correct. The difference appears when interpreting the true nature of these alleged particles (we will explain this further).

Now an example of a difference as pertaining to the CONCEPT itself.

You have an important parameter that you call SPIN or INTRINSIC MOMENT and you " know " that it is quantified by five measurements. (Some Physicists of the Earth interpreted this SPIN as a ROTATION of the PARTICLE by assigning a MOMENT for its measurement).

We, on the other hand, know that such a rotation does not exist, and that the quantification of its value is a error because if within a three-dimensional framework the Number of values is finite, the possible orientations of the " quadric " of the OAWOO which you interpret as SPIN, could never be measured correctly.

Finally, we point out another assumption of yours which we have rejected as entirely false: Certain physicists of the Earth currently conceive the PROTON as being formed of MESONS. To follow this erroneous path could delay Earth research in the field of physics for many years. The primitive assumption which consisted in viewing the Proton as an indivisible particle is closer to reality.

A COMPARISON FOR PEOPLE LITTLE-VERSED IN PHYSICS

During the last several years, the physicists of OYAAGAA have delved deeper into the intimate nature of matter. Little by little you have obtained a catalogue of a series of particles to which you assign a series of parameters whose measurement is possible using your current laboratory instruments.

Thus you are able to measure the MASS at rest and its actual energy, its electric charge, its SPIN and its ORBITAL MOMENT. You may not know all these characteristics of a particle at a given moment but you have the possibility of locating it in a definite point.

However many physicists suppose that a particle has a reality (either as a phenomenon concentrated in an environment of limited radius, or as a real quantity or Quantum of ENERGY, without being able to define the size and the position of it). However without INTERACTIONS, and before the possible collision with another particle, the particle can follow a path which you can visualise (in a NIELLO chamber for instance), all the while preserving its initial attributes of MASS, SPIN, ORBIT, CHARGE and ENERGY.

Before continuing, we will give you two schematic comparisons.
You employ during your popular festivals a chain of rockets surrounded by a continuous wick (in Spain you call this a CHAIN (of firecrackers (ndt))

Imagine that an observer sees a street far away on which one of these chains has been extended D 59_FG33 (NDS: drawing illegible on the photocopied document). When the first firecracker explodes, a OEMII runs while carrying a sparkler in a direction parallel to the chain. The firecrackers on the chain explode one after the other very quickly and can cause the optical illusion for our observer that it is a LIGHT running along the cord. He will think he sees two LIGHTS moving in parallel trajectories:
- the runner with the sparkler
- the sequential firing of the firecrackers.
He will perhaps not see the difference, and may even believe that there are two people running with sparklers.

You thus see the difference between these two PHYSICAL conceptions. The PHYSICISTS of OYAAGAA would accept the " version " of the runner with the sparkler. The Physicists of our Planet know that the movement of particles could be compared to the metaphor of the chain of firecrackers.

If a radioactive mineral emits B (Beta) rays, you believe that the electron which started from the substance is the same one which, after a few centimetres, collides with, for instance, an oxygen molecule.
Our model differs enormously from this image. The ELECTRON IN ITSELF DOES NOT EXIST (just like one cannot say that a flash or an explosion exists in the firecracker). YES there is a chain of IBOZOO UU invisible to our eyes and to our instruments because of the particular orientation of these OAWOO (axes) . Moreover certain OAWOO of each component of this series, or chain, change direction consecutively, only to return to their initial orientation.
This is what gives the illusion of movement, and it is imperceptible to the senses and escapes your current instruments.

It is not possible to conceive of an ISOLATED PARTICLE outside the WAAM (cosmos), just as it would be unimaginable to think of a WAVE of the ocean not associated with WATER.

Not only is ENERGY quantified (and here the Earth physicists were not mistaken) but so is the MAGNITUDE "DISTANCES". (It is impossible to distinguish "a real quantity " smaller than 12.^-13 cm, which is the angular relationship between two dependent or related IBOZOO UU) . Specifically, a SUBATOMIC PARTICLE has as its base an IBOZOO UU and another which is RELATED (We use the word RELATED for we do not find another more adapted in your language; we believe that the word ADJACENT would suggest a positioning of the IBOZOO UU and we have already pointed out that an IBOZOO UU exists but that one cannot position it)..

We will try to represent a AYUU (network) of IBOZOO UU in an ideal plane so that none of the IBOZOO UU direct one of their OAWOO (axes) perpendicularly to the Fictitious Plane that we have traced.


We say that A is " related " with VDU (DUU OII) and that VDU is DUU OII (related) with Y.
An OEMII will consider this network as " EMPTY " and will erroneously identify it with NOTHING. For her there is no MATTER, nor a GRAVITATIONAL or ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD, nor WEAK INTERACTIONS, nor NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS. In short she will extrapolate this AYUU (network) from the COSMOS she knows.

By studying the true nature of the particles or entities which you call Proton, Meson, Neutrino, Electron, etc our specialists discovered that there are actually small deformations of space incorrecly named three-dimensional in the axis of other
dimensions. Imagine a very wide cloth. This would be the comparison of Three-dimensional Space we would call a vacuum. If we now make a small hollow or deformation in the cloth, it could represent the mass of a proton or even a meson, depending as much on the Axis of the deformation as on its magnitude or depth.
Now. If you look at the cloth from one side, you will see a concavity (proton), but if you look at it from the back, you will see instead a convexity or protuberance (Antiproton). Moreover, depending on your position from various points of view, this deformation can appear more or less oblique to you, i.e. applied in different axes or dimensions, thus appearing to be sometimes a Neutron or even some another subatomic particle at other times.
In a word, the interpretation of such a particle will depend on the observer's system of reference. This is why physicists of the Earth are so perplexed when they discover hundreds of subatomic particles, which seem to have no end. In reality you are chasing shadows. (this last point is not a criticism of Earth scientific research in the field of Quantum and Nuclear Physics inasmuch as you continue to analyse the various characteristics of these particles, but because you regard them as different entities.

With this the editors make a point of adding note 4 of the document on UEWA OEMM (spacecraft), which includes some specifics on the IBOZOO UU:

To understand the effect of OAWOENNIUU (nuclear resonance) we would have to explain our theory of the fundamental makeup of space and matter. I will try to formulate a summary by using concepts which are familiar to you.
Suppose for example a numerically reduced whole of molybdenum atoms: for example Mo1, Mo2, Mo3...Mo114 whose nuclei have the characteristic, in one determined instant, of having a configuration identical to their energy levels as per the distribution of the nucleons. The fact that the quantum levels of their electronic shell are different, or that the orbits of these are distributed in an unspecified chemical sequence, then makes us say that these atoms are OAWOOENI (in resonance)
We also know that an unspecified atomic particle (neutron, proton, kaon, etc.) is actually a different projection, within a three-dimensional framework, of a same mathematically-true entity that we call IBOZOO UU (up to where we grant in the WAAM (universe) the attribute of truth or existence to the IBOZOO UU)
You can think of the IBOZOO UU by a didactic image, as "a beam "or "package "of " ideal axes "from which the various multi-directional orientations would give rise to a physicist interpreting this "beam "or "cluster "(or " hedgehog ") with multiple directed points, sometimes as a quantum, other times as a mass, an electric charge, an orbital moment, etc. They represent actually the various axial orientations of the IBOZOO UU in the same way that different chromatic tones have as their bases different frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum.
Imagine that we try to disorientate, within the Mo1 atom, only one nucleon (a proton for example); it can happen that the inversion is not absolute, in this case you would observe a conversion of the mass of the proton into energy.
D E = m C2 + K, m being the mass of the proton and K a constant.
A Niobium isotope is thus obtained. But we can force the confusion of "the axes "of the IBOZOO UU (absolute inversion) in a manner such that an observant physicist would see, much to their surprise, that the proton would seem to be destroyed without a release of energy. This phenomenon would seem to you to contradict the universal principle of conservation of mass and energy (a conservation called into question by other Earth physicists; indeed the assumptions formulated by some of your scientists on the true creation of matter in the universe are actually based on the fact that indeed the sets of IBOZOO UU are reversed completely within our three-dimensional framework, being observable by those who live there).
You will then see a negatively-ionized Niobium atom. Without a doubt, the remainder of the n-1 Molybdenum atoms have undergone a deterioration in their nuclear energy levels, so that the nucleic energy of each one of these atoms develops as , checking that:

R1 = radial Distances to the Niobium atom from each remaining Mo atom.

: "constants "of the system whose values are a function not only of N, but also of the structures of the nuclei of R1.
The energy transferred to the remaining nuclei by this resonance effect is quantified so as to be able to arrive at being zero for an atom from the group located at a distance R, higher than the defined threshold.

Thus, if we manage to excite a Molybdenum atom (Mo1) located in a transmitting body (image C) by inverting one of its nucleons, we will observe in a receiving body containing another Mo2, a quantum deterioration in the latter, all the higher since there will be fewer parasitic atoms in resonance in the vicinity. We should point out that the transfer of energy does not happen by means of an excitative field so that the time of transmission is zero (we then speak of transfer speed or infinite information flows).
This physical principle would apparently facilitate the development of an instantaneous communication system for enormous interplanetary distances, so that a message would not take several light-years to arrive at destination.
Unfortunately, this is unrealizable in practice, for the existence of free "disturbing" or parasitic atoms, in resonance with the transmitter, would absorb all the energy of the system. A quantifiable part of it could thus never be transferred by resonance to so distant an atom. With the result that there are no masses in the vicinity of the Network of a similar chemical element to attenuate the transmitted signals.

UMMITE PHYSICS AND METAPHYSICS

PART TWO

UNIVERSES, PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION

WAAM Our visible universe
U-WAAM Our "twin "anti-universe (anti-cosmos)
WAAM-UWAAM-BWAAM of the BUAWA Universe of living beings
WAAM-OUWAAM-BBWAAM of BUAWA BIAEI Universe of collective spirits, collective consciousness, also: " the universe of forms"
WAAM-WAAM Cluster of set of the existing Universes

A AIUUBAHAYII - Network of living beings or living being
B.B. BUUAUWEE BIAEII (BUAUE BIAEII) Collective mental structure BB (sometime write like O U).
I.U IBOZOO UU Elementary subparticles or ?
B.I BAAYODUHU Unifying factor between B.B. and chromosomes. Symbol: )--o-- (
O OEEMBUUAW Krypton linking B.B. with the brain
U WAAM-U cell, "home" of the soul B (Buuawa)(sometime write like U)
OR Collective spirit integrated into the WAAM-OU

IBOZOO UU
It is difficult to discuss a concept which in our science is still subject to multiple interpretations. The theory of the IBOZOO UU is the unified theory which our scientists have been seeking. We would like as much as you understand the richness of this theory. It has the benefit of being beautiful and harmonious (an idea dear to Kepler), although it is not very reliable.
Regardless of what the oummites say, we find in this concept the notion of ETHER which was supplanted by the theory of relativity. Ether was invented to explain 19th century quantum theories. This medium was used to explain, among other things, the propagation of particles, electromagnetic interactions, etc. but very quickly, scientists noted inconsistencies between the definition of such a system and real observation. Einstein does not completely abandon the idea of Ether in his work, but he did not have time to define its form.
The IBOZOO UU are an Ether, or a kind of matrix without a frame of reference which defines the entire architecture of the universe. The subparticles (matter, elementary particles) are not "plunged" in this matrix, but rather the matrix (the whole of the IBOZOO UU) IS matter, the gravitational field, photons, time, electromagnetism, distance... It is understood that one must not introduce an order or a specific arrangement of IBOZOO UU within this network since they themselves are the source of order. How to define a common electron within this theory? This small animation will aid with understanding. (animation that can be found on the web site)
You say that the alignment of these dominos is a network of IBOZOO UU related two to two (in " reality ", the network is not ordered). The oummites specify in their texts that an IBOZOO UU alone does not have meaning; what is crucial is the variation of the angle and transmissions of information from one IBOZOO UU to another. The first domino transmits to its neighbor an energy which makes it tumble, and thus a ripple propagates down the endless chain. The ripple itself does not exist independently; it exists only by means of the dominos. That is what an electron is, a wave / a corpuscle which results from the information communicated through the network of IBOZOO UU related two to two.
Let us refine this concept a little and imagine that the information which is communicated along this chain of dominos (IBOZOO UU) is of the magnitude MASSES. The ripple appears to us as a mass (an electron),clearly visible, but to say then that it is elementary does make sense. The oummites go on to say that the IBOZOO UU can have ten different magnitudes. We can suppose that they define the universe.
This theory is like defining a set in mathematics, provided that the objects which make it up conform to the laws of stability and composition. These mathematical laws operate on multidimensional objects (the IBOZOO UU), whose multiple dimensions (vectors and their magnitudes) are the principal dimensions of our universe (length, force, time, mass, impulse, energy etc). The laws of composition (yet to be defined, since obviously the oummites do not pass them on to us) provide us with relations between the dimensional parameters of these objects, making it possible to find the physical non-variants (the laws of stability).
Modern physics remains obsessed with these stable laws, those which we observe. The laws of composition which we seek would make it possible to find these known laws and to discover new ones, like the famous gravitational wave. So we know the set, a large number of objects which make it up, the nature of a great number of these objects, and a certain number of stable laws. To demonstrate what the oummites propose requires nothing more than the discovery of the laws of composition by which we will find the physical non-variants and bring to light the phenomena that still elude us. But what have scientists been doing since Evariste Gallois !

WAAM - WAAM
The WAAM - WAAM, translation: pluri-cosmos. To understand this vision of the universe, we should quickly discard all our S.F. novels (even though the Ummite file can be compared to the world's greatest role playing game). In fact, it is not a question of a multitude of parallel universes, but rather of universes with different physical properties. These properties being related closely to the orientations of the multiple vectors of the IBOZOO UU. We recommend you read and understand this concept before going any further in " the exploration " of the cosmos. Thus to some extent, the WAAM resembles Hawking's theory on "bubble-universes" (see the Champs / Flamarion collection for a simplified explanation) but he did not build a logical system that would make such universes possible...

Returning to WAAM-WAAM, the Oummites say that we are plunged in a multidimensional universe which exists in multiple combinations within its structure. But for the Ummite, dimension is not a vector or scalar, dimension is a three-dimensional frame in which properties specific to that frame EXIST, these properties being related to the orientation of the vector axes of the IBOZOO UU. First example, since you may already be overwhelmed, a positron does not exist in a natural state within our three-dimensional frame (it is a position, not a demonstration), but is in its natural state in another three-dimensional frame, and its specificity in the latter is the same one as the electron within our frame.
WAAM- WAAM consists of an infinite number of three-dimensional frames with two well defined limits,which will be developed further. The difference with our concepts lies in the definition of dimension. We saw in the chapter on the IBOZOO UU that everything we call particles or waves is defined by the angular variation of the axes of the vectors of two dependent IBOZOO UU. A photon, an electron, a " graviton ", can thus be defined by the amount of variation of the orientations of the vectors of the I.U. Space-time plunges us into a 4-dimensional frame, or 4 vectors, in Ummite terms.. The IBOZOO UU has 10 vectors. Our frame or our dimension is defined by the orientation of its vectors, and since there are an infinite number of possible angular orientations of these vectors, there is an infinite number of tetra-dimensional frames.
It's now easier to understand why one cannot really speak about parallel universes, but could draw an analogy between the universe (the WAAM - WAAM) in the diversity of its frames, and the different possible physical states of water (gas, liquid, solid); all these states coexist, but it always remains a substance made up of H2O molecules. We live in water in its gaseous state, but other beings can only exist in water in its solid state...(it is an analogy!). Another example: any image on a monitor is made up of three constutuent signals: Red, Green and Blue. If the whole screen is green, you will not be able to see a single green point. On the other hand, if your screen is yellow, you will be able to distinguish a single green point on this background...It is all just a question of one reference frame defined by another reference frame, the RGB signal. It is not about the distance between the various universes, about time, or other things; it is a question of the specific characteristics of the IBOZOO UU which define these universes.
The oummites say to have been able to" plunge themselves " into ten different frameworks by means of a a simple variation of THEIR IBOZOO UU (which ones????) but the framework that is more interesting to us is the U-WAAM or anti-universe ; it differs only by the vector which characterizes the mass; it is thus symmetrical to us, mathematically speaking. One of its effects would be to contain our galaxy in a kind of cocoon and to thus counteract the effect of centrifugal force not compensated for by the famous "missing mass" which always eludes observation. In the same way, this universe " skirts " ours in its pluri-geometry, and its uniqueness lies in the fact that the speed of the light in its centre could be 50 times higher than in our universe, thus providing the possibility of traveling very quickly from one point to another in our space at very high speed. We would no longer need hundreds of years to go to the nearest star. (This is what astronomers such as Ribes proclaim, at least that is his official position).

We spoke to you about the boundary universes, which they are in terms of the state of their IBOZOO UU. These universes are the BUAWA and BUAWE BIAEI. On one hand, the universe of Souls ( or spirits), on the other, the universe of the Souls' souls. Their defining characteristics are:
* BUAWA Universe: zero mass, photon velocity zero, time is thus "frozen", and a constantly expanding radius.
* BUAWE BIAEI Universe: infinite mass, photon velocity infinite, constantly expanding radius.
It is surprising to see how much those who revealed these texts have integrated physically what for us is nothing but pure speculation...The oummites have no reason to manufacture religion since they have modeled our intuitions. In this respect, such a society is inherently stable. At least from this point of view.
Once again, we would say that we only observe the universe from our seat....PLATO! Here is the man who should have been listened to in the sciences, PLATO and his cave....Pure objectification! The oummites would say that tetravalence takes the place of Manicheism.

BUAWE BIAEI
BUAWE BIAEI, which the oummites translated as " Community or social spirit ", is connected to a collective spirit. This "being "is in fact a regrouping of the Souls (or spirits) of all those who populate a star. The oummites are mistaken in thinking that our theologists never foresaw the possibility of such a Being. In " the phenomenon of man" Theillard de Chardin speaks about a " souls' Soul " which resembles BUAWE BIAEI in its philosophical sense. Perhaps the oummites have not read everything...
One of the roles of this being is very " simple "; since it is the idea of WOA, it integrates its patterns of behaviour or " moral laws ". By an internal process of our brain in connection with this Being, the BUAWE BIAEI continuously sends us patterns or models of behaviour, since we are a conscious humanity. There is also an opposite process which informs the BUAWE BIAEI through us (our body). Indeed, all that we collect through our senses, as well as our mental processes, are dispatched to this entity to carry out a kind of update of this great Soul of souls. After a " data processing ", information comes down again to our brain.
To take only the Christian religion as an example, the idea of a collective Spirit is not spelled out in the Bible, but rather of an anthropomorphic vision of a " place " where Souls (or spirits) are joined together after the death of the body: " paradise ". As regards the expression of the moral codes through us, Christendom calls upon the Holy Spirit to inspire us (in spiritus: the spirit in us). BUAWE BIAEI would be a very rough unification of these two concepts Christianity. But the obvious question is: what is it that allows this connection to exist between entities so distant in their physical reality? See the chapter on the OEMBUAW.
BUAWE BIAEI also directs the entire process of evolution through a process close to OEMBUAW, through its quantum characteristics, called BAYIODUU. We are not talking here of an anthropic process such as we conceive it evolution theory, but rather of a capacity to start a phylum of evolution when certain criteria (social, climatic, cosmological, geological etc) have been established.

The BAYODUU
As we defined in the BUAWE BIAEI, this universe where the collective spirits of the various planetary "humanities" is stored plays a major role in the phylum of evolution of living beings. In fact, this collective psyche " contains the information which modulates evolution ". Should we then consider that the oummites think of the evolution process as an anthropic principle, and that all life is determined and follows a divine plan?. YES or NOT, and this " or " is inclusive. In fact the theory is a wise combination of Darwinism, creationism and the theory of checks and balances so dear to S.J. Gould. But more importantly, it is Theillard de Chardin's theory that dominates in the oummite explanation of evolution. This man, quite terrestrial, bequeathed us a theory that few scientists dare to approach even today. Could it be because this scientist/paleontologist/anthropologist was above all a priest!, a condition that rejects science in principle?...so let us stop here. No?, then let us keep an open mind. Let us remember that we have as object of study a group of extraterrestria beings, that we have never seen and who however make people credulous!! Similar attitude with religious beliefs. Thus we must study what our contemporaries propose in parallel with what our Unidentified Flying Oummites put forward.
We observe in nature a phenomenon of complexification of life, all theories recognize this, but all diverge as soon as one speaks about adaptation. Theillard and the oummites (an amusing combination) believe that organisms respond to the environment, not through a long process of natural selection (Darwin) but rather by means of a pre-organization directed by an intra and/or extra genomic phenomenon. That does not mean that the biotope does not select; it imposes a configuration of life in its upgrading capabilities (of phylum). This nuance is disturbing, since random changes no longer play the dominant role which sticks in the majority of evolutionary theories.
There would be an " intelligent " process which directs all life, in conformity with the environment. Theillard de Chardin, like Darwin, used his observations to infer his theory but he could only explain it in one fabulous philosophical essay: "the phenomenon of man". If you read this book (1930) and the oummite texts (1966), you will see huge areas of similarity. But in another text the oummites acknowledge that certain Earth scientists revealed many concepts which were unknown to them.
Today, Theillard re-appears in scientific theses, and certain paleo-anthropologists (French) discovered that there was a logic in human complexification. Logic which makes on foresee a directing process which remains to be discovered. Theillard compared this logic to the Omega point, and named it an attractor (in the mathematical sense) which directs evolution towards an optimum point: humankind. The oummites say the same (obviously) and name the directing process Buawe Biaei, acting by means of the BAYODUU.
The BAYODUU is integrated into the DNA of living beings, It is a double network of IBOZOO UU which acts in our physical reality in resonance with BUAWE BIAEI (a similar principle in the OEMBUAW_). All the possibilities of phylum preexist, it is like defining all the possibilities of combinations in a game of chess. These possibilities are " connected " to the BUAWE BIAEI and can be integrated in the BAYODUU. If you refer to the diagram, we have simplified the BAYODUU.
The BAYODUU receives information which defines the environment, this information is compared to the existing genomic configuration and if a change is needed, this BAYODUU starts the adequate genetic mutation. Furthermore, we saw that there was an ultimate goal for man (Theillard's Omega point). This goal is the logical orientation that evolution in general follows, and which was recently emphasized by our scientists in human evolution. In conclusion, we could say that the BUAWE BIAEI / BAYODUU couple is a gödelian, or meta-gödelien principle. We would be the result of another reality which assists our evolution. But we could not evolve without this attractor. This approaches the work of the physicist Penrose, or the winner of the Nobel Prize for medicine Eccles when they try to define a similar entity mathematically: CONSCIOUSNESS.

The BUAWA
The BUAWA (the Soul or spirit) takes up the concepts of our principal religions. The BUAWA is not in time, it is not in space accessible to us through our senses, but just like BUAWE BIAEI, it has a physical reality WAAM WAAM. Its role is to encode all events, like a computer memory; it integrates all that our senses perceive and all our mental processes throughout our life. In a reverse process, the BUAWA directs the behaviour of our three-dimensional body that the oummites call OEMII. In other words, exit the worship of the body, which for the oummites is only a sensor that informs on one hand the BUAWA and on the other by BUAWE BIAEI through a process named OEMBUAW.
Thus one can better understand why the oummites consider that each living being is untimately responsible before its community, for if by misfortune a small network of deviators takes form, the BUAWE BIAEI is affected and by reflection in the BUAWE BIAEI, all Ummite humanity suffers. This is why they detect all psychotics or schizophrenics in their society and prevent them from harming the whole (by a nonpainful means which is in fact only a surgical procedure). This is why their society reminds us so much of an anthill, each being similar but all united for the progress in the evolution of their consciousness.

THE OEMBUAW
The OEMBUAW is what the oummites call man's third factor. This process connects the OEMII to his Soul or spirit (the BUAWA) and makes him thus responsible before WOA, for man's behaviour is not pre-determined like animals, which (apparently) do not have this factor. The being equipped with OEMBUAW is thus free to follow or transgress the moral and irreducible laws of WOA, which shows why the Oummite very strictly " corrects " those who would dare to violate the transcendent laws of their "God ".
One could wonder how an adimensiona entity, the BUAWA, can direct a dimensional and temporal entity, the OEMII. It is here that the OEMBUAW intervenes. It is necessary understand the theory of the IBOZO UU, for this is a quantum process which, being by nature non-determined, acts as the bond between the body, the Soul, the collective spirit. It is commonly known that the location of the electron around its nucleus cannot be pinpointed because it is neither wave, nor particle in the same way Heisenberg's uncertainty principle shows that the behavior of subatomic particles is subject to random occurences as regards their location / velocity. If two entities which differ in their physical nature (the BUAWA and the OEMII) must exchange information, it can only happen through an ambivalent quantum-based principle.
The OEMBUAW is a network of IBOZOO UU not susceptible to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, because it enters into resonance (in the physical sense of the word), giving it the power "long-distance" information exchange. But in no case does it transgress the laws of physics, it simply uses a particularity of nature. To better understand this, let us make use of a very simple image. If you have a guitar in a romm where music is playing, occasionally the strings of the guitar will start to vibrate, it is a resonance. The OEMBUAW is the guitar string, your body like the body of the guitar, and the BUAWA can be compared to the music. The process is identical with the BUAWE BIAEI and this in sense OEMII / BUAWE BIAEI or BUAWE BIAEI / OEMII.
The oummites localise this factor in the human brain, and the resonance is set in motion by a series of atoms of a rare gas, Krypton. As we can see in the chapters devoted to BUAWA and BUAWE BIAEI, everything collected by our mental processes and our senses is codified in the OEMBUAW and stored by this state of resonance in the BUAWA_ and BUAWE BIAEI. The reciprocal case is also true. This is how the oummites explain telepathy, which they usually use to overcome their " natural " speech deficiency. Through the OEMBUAW, the BUAWA sends a thought which then passes in another network of IBOZOO UU of the OEMBUAW to send it to BUAWE BIAEI. The latter sends the information towards the intended recipient of the message (a code, a key is specific to each Being) through his OEMBUAW and finally, the network responsible for the transmission towards the recipient's BUAWA, sends the message to the recipient's BUAWA (phew!) You will understand better by referring to the general outlines. You see that man's third factor is of primary importance in a human network, for it allows a connection beyond the senses, it unifies the expression of the collective spirit to all the beings who would like to integrate them (let us not forget that we are free.).
From the point of view of Earth science, what to say? Admittedly quantum physics is in an embryonic state, we do not yet understand or model mathematically the reality of what we see. Particle physics shows that today quantum behavior cannot be adequately expressed mathematically. It is up to the mathematicians to work out a language that physics will be able to use in its observations. The oummites always use our scientific weaknesses to advance large logical concepts. The Soul or spirit, the body, psyche, soma, all this enters with difficulty into scientific consideration, and we have only religion to affirm or deny the oummite concepts...a weak basis since it is indemonstrable. We are only able to say: it is logical and it would explain all these things we infer or foresee. But why do religions exist? why social phenomena? Why do we find identical concepts in peoples who evolved separately? One can work out theories, but if there is no language to express them they will remain conceptual.

WOA
Already, the word " religion " disturbs our friends the oummites, for religion is not a scientific concept. For a religion to be established, it is necessary to believe in values / beings / concepts which essentially remain without rational explanation. The verb To believe or Faith is paradoxical for the Ummites, who only consider true the fact that science evolves. But careful! The Ummites are more subtle. They do not even think that their science is true, but only that it is exploitable in the current state of its knowledge or its consciousness (we will see further on why consciousness plays such a fundamental role). All new acceptable models can redesign all theories.
In the state, we could consider that there is no god for these people. First misconception; the oummites consider a God they name WOA.. WOA is a modeller of ideas, a generator, all the laws of cosmos come from him. WOA does not enter into our physical reality, but to say that he is adimensional is very reducing. The oummites prefer to speak of a Being unable to be captured in our thought, thus physically inaccessible to us, in the strictest sense, and nowhere in the Ummite texts is there a physical or mathematical definition of WOA, and it is " theologically " impossible to do so. The best definition which illustrates their idea of God is: " WOA is a creative being of ideas, of an infinite number of ideas, insofar as these ideas are not incompatible with the essential element of WAAM " It is necessary to understand by ideas all that IS (exists) in the WAAM, from the quark to the architecture of a galaxy, to the role of the document you are reading right now.
This remains still quite simple and strongly resembles our theological conceptions of God. Where the oummites diverge from us is in the Beings which coexist with WOA. It is unfortunately necessary to summarize so that everyone can follow, but let us say that there are other always adimensional and atemporal entities which are not WOA, but which answer this need for being, always following the logic that any being must implicitly exist if this being is not incompatible with the essence of WOA. This IS BUAWE BIAEI.

OEMII
The OEMII : The sensory organ, the material thinking being, endowed with reason plunged in the WAAM - WAAM. This is how the oummites define the human being, a single sensory receiver, able to